MSP | Learning & Training Programs
We welcome external contributions. Please feel free to use the “comment” function to share your thoughts with us or suggest additional solutions you would like us to feature.
Training programmes that focus on organisational leadership for leaders of NGO networks operating in humanitarian contexts are designed to strengthen not only individual skills but also the systems, cultures, and strategic capacities that enable networks of organisations to operate effectively. These programmes vary significantly in delivery method, with each modality offering distinct advantages depending on leaders’ operational realities.
Offline, face-to-face programmes—often delivered as multi-day workshops or residential courses—are particularly effective for organisational leadership development. These formats support intensive group work, real-time problem-solving using participants’ organisational challenges, and trust-building across networks. However, they require sustained time away from operations and higher financial investment, which can limit participation for smaller organisations or leaders in acute response settings.
Online programmes, by contrast, prioritise accessibility and flexibility, enabling leaders to engage alongside their ongoing responsibilities. These typically consist of self-paced modules or short facilitated virtual courses focused on core organisational leadership themes. While online delivery can be more flexible and cost less, these courses will not come with the same level of peer exchange and networking opportunities as in-person approaches. It may be wise to combine online-only trainings with participation in a peer-to-peer learning exchange platform or organisational twinning programme (see next two sections).
Hybrid models increasingly combine the strengths of both approaches, using online modules to build shared conceptual foundations and in-person intensive or live virtual workshops to deepen learning through action planning, peer exchange, and facilitated reflection for organisational leaders.
The scope and size of curricula also differ, shaping the depth of organisational impact. Short courses or workshops tend to focus on targeted leadership competencies and are well suited for leaders seeking immediate, practical tools. Medium-length programmes (spanning several weeks or months) offer a more holistic approach, covering organisational strategy, leadership identity, power and ethics, change management, and network leadership, often accompanied by coaching or peer-learning components. Longer certificate or diploma programmes provide the most comprehensive organisational leadership development but require funding and time commitments that may be beyond the feasibility horizon of most local NGOs.
PROS and CONS
Pros: A vast catalogue of high-quality courses developed by global experts; possibility of acquiring certification; options range from short courses to full curricula; many courses are self-paced so that staff can choose when to engage; ability to select courses or programmes that specifically address gaps for organisations and individuals; flexibility in terms of cost, time commitment and delivery methods; self-paced options.
Cons: Online courses require access to a minimum level of connectivity and to proper IT equipment; courses are generally global in nature and not specifically designed for individual contexts; most courses are available only in English or in other European languages; training must be repeated if and when individuals leave the organisation; relationships with the training provider are generally transactional: they end when the course/program is finished; large disparity between training options for English and non-English speakers.
USER SELECTION CONSIDERATIONS
Relevance: Do the courses apply to the kind of leadership skills prioritised by the networks? Are they relevant to the operational and programmatic contexts at hand? Are they geared specifically toward non-profits or more tailored to business audiences?
Delivery method: Will the network leaders be able to access the courses? Is there flexibility in accessing the coursework? Can the programme accommodate travel schedules, languages, and multiple time commitments of network leaders?
Group vs. individual programmes: Does the training allow multiple leaders to take part in courses together? If so, are there opportunities for team-building and group work?
Time: Is the overall time commitment expected compatible with the schedules of the participants? How flexible is the course work (i.e. self-paced vs. fixed schedule)? If fixed, does it align with the availability of participants?
Cost: Prices for trainings can range from free to several thousand dollars for each participant. Higer cost trainings may be subsidised or entirely covered by grant funding but only if allowed by the donor.
Access: If the courses are online, will the participants be able to meet minimum requirements in terms of connectivity and have access to the right equipment? If in-person, can the attendees physically attend the sessions when expected?
Language: The language of the training program must be in line with the actual abilities of not only the training participants but also by those who may indirectly benefit from the training materials shared in the program.
Prerequisites: Some courses may require participants to have achieved a certain level of education or achieved some prior certification in order to register for the course
EXAMPLES
Global training platforms with free courses relevant to humanitarian non-profits and networks include Disaster Ready and KayaConnect though many more are available (see table in the Annex). There also exist regional e-learning platforms like Edraak in the Middle East that offer context-specific courses.
For NGO Network Management and Coordination:
As an example of how one organisation has used these free resources in a systemic manner at scale, one can look at the ISHA project in Syria where Mercy Corps and Disaster Ready developed a comprehensive training online training curriculum for local NGOs, ultimately training over 119,000 humanitarian professionals and volunteers.
There are few specialised training providers for Network Management and Coordination but some consulting firms do make available focused learning materials. One example is Visible Networks Labs which host a Network Leadership Learning Lab that provides access to previous webinar series (their Network Leadership Academy is currently on hold).
One related field of study with extensive training offerings is Alliance Leadership, a field that extends beyond NGO networks but features significant overlap. The Association of Strategic Alliance Professionals (ASAP) has developed two professional standards (the CA-AM and CSAP) and offer certification courses for a fee.
For Organisational Leadership training:
The CIFAL Global Network is composed of 32 International Training Centres for Authorities and Leaders, all coordinated by UNITAR. Each CIFAL centre provides innovative training and serves as a hub for the exchange of knowledge amongst government officials, the private sector, and civil society. Their course catalogue can be found here: CGN Catalogue 2025.pdf
NGO leaders who want to develop a more entrepreneurial style of leadership can apply to the Acumen Fellowship program, a 6-month hybrid program consisting of virtual courses, in-person sessions, and self-paced learning. The Fellowship connects graduates to a global community of social entrepreneurs and leaders. Enrolment is free but competitive. Free online self-guided courses are available in the Acumen Academy (in English only).
Humentum has a catalogue of NGO management courses that can be delivered in multiple formats, not only remotely but also via NGO in-house training where trainers come to the non-profit to deliver a customised training in the client’s language of choice, for a fee.
Universities, including those based in the Global South, generally offer stand-alone courses, certificate programmes or full degree programmes on organisational management and leadership. These will be generally offered in at least one of the national languages of the country in which they are based. Long-term partnerships, which can include reciprocal student internship opportunities may be possible.